Трамп высказался об отношениях с ЛукашенкоТрамп: С Белоруссией у нас очень хорошие отношения, мне очень нравится их лидер
Цены на нефть взлетели до максимума за полгода17:55
，更多细节参见heLLoword翻译官方下载
Best budget massage gun:
Гангстер одним ударом расправился с туристом в Таиланде и попал на видео18:08
，推荐阅读旺商聊官方下载获取更多信息
各级人民政府应当加强社会治安综合治理，采取有效措施，预防和化解社会矛盾纠纷，增进社会和谐，维护社会稳定。，推荐阅读91视频获取更多信息
It’s Not AI Psychosis If It Works#Before I wrote my blog post about how I use LLMs, I wrote a tongue-in-cheek blog post titled Can LLMs write better code if you keep asking them to “write better code”? which is exactly as the name suggests. It was an experiment to determine how LLMs interpret the ambiguous command “write better code”: in this case, it was to prioritize making the code more convoluted with more helpful features, but if instead given commands to optimize the code, it did make the code faster successfully albeit at the cost of significant readability. In software engineering, one of the greatest sins is premature optimization, where you sacrifice code readability and thus maintainability to chase performance gains that slow down development time and may not be worth it. Buuuuuuut with agentic coding, we implicitly accept that our interpretation of the code is fuzzy: could agents iteratively applying optimizations for the sole purpose of minimizing benchmark runtime — and therefore faster code in typical use cases if said benchmarks are representative — now actually be a good idea? People complain about how AI-generated code is slow, but if AI can now reliably generate fast code, that changes the debate.